The FTC lately gained its^( over the chipmaker’s anticompetitive industry practices.
As first reported through prison professional Florian Mueller on his weblog ^( , U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh has dominated that Qualcomm’s so-called “no license, no chips” fashion, below which the chipmaker has refused to supply chips to corporations with no patent license, violates federal antitrust regulations.
The ruling has important implications for Apple, as Koh ordered that Qualcomm should negotiate or renegotiate license phrases with its consumers in excellent religion with out threatening to bring to an end get admission to to its cell modem chips or comparable device and technical enhance, in line with Mueller.
Qualcomm additionally should make patent licenses to be had to rival cell modem providers on truthful, affordable, and non-discriminatory or “FRAND” phrases, and would possibly not input unique agreements for the provision of modem chips.
^( in early 2018 over those anticompetitive industry practices, and unpaid royalty rebates, however the two corporations ^( closing month. The agreement features a six-year licensing settlement and a multiyear chipset provide settlement.
It’s unclear if Apple had any trace that the FTC used to be prone to win its antitrust case and if that had any implications on its agreement with Qualcomm.
While apparently that Intel will stay the only provider of LTE modems in^( , Qualcomm is ^( now that the firms have settled, so Koh’s ruling may result in a fairer settlement between Apple and Qualcomm shifting ahead.
Farther down the street, more than one stories have indicated that Apple is^( that may permit it to drop Qualcomm for excellent, even though they won’t seem in iPhones ^( .
Qualcomm will most likely enchantment the ruling, however Mueller believes the chipmaker faces an uphill fight given “the sort of wealthy and robust frame of proof” relating to its anticompetitive industry practices. Mueller has^( this is smartly value a learn.
BREAKING NEWS: Federal Trade Commission wins #antitrust case towards #Qualcomm in Northern District of California ^( Among different issues, standard-essential #patents MUST be authorized on the element stage. $QCOM @FTC #ftc #ftcqcom
— Florian Mueller (@FOSSpatents) May 22, 2019
Koh’s whole ruling is embedded forward.
^( through ^( on Scribd
This article, “^( ” first seemed on ^(
^( in our boards